Analysis of the Superstructure and Depth of Resistance Poetry: A Case Study of Qasem Haddad's Poetry

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of the Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Zabol University.

Abstract

Assessing the different levels of discourse allows for a new understanding of it and discovers the interactions of language with ideological structures. Critical discourse analysis makes it possible to examine the two factors of ideology and power that have an important impact on the superstructure and depth of language in the process of linguistic communication. Teun van Dijk, one of the theorists in this field, considers critical discourse analysis as a powerful tool for social analysis. His proposed model is a good criterion for analyzing the poetry of resistance, which is often based on highlighting the positive points of the "self" and marginalizing the negative points of the "other". Qassim Haddad (1926-1995) is one of the contemporary Bahraini poets that is attributed to socio-political poetry, whose bipolar system of emphasis and marginalization plays a key role in shaping his poetic discourse. Relying on a descriptive-analytical method, the present study seeks to show what discourse measures Qassim Haddad used in the superstructure of his resistance poems in order to deepen it in order to highlight his own identity and marginalize another identity. The results show that the discourse system of Qassim Haddad's resistance poems is based more on semantic techniques, propositional structure, grammar and reasoning.

Keywords

References

باطنی، محمدرضا. (1366ش). نگاهی تازه به دستور زبان، چ1. تهران: آگاه،
حداد، قاسم. (2000م). الأعمال الشعریة. بیروت: المؤسسة العربیة للدراسات والنشر.
خورشا، صادق؛ توحیدی‌فر، نرجس. (1399ش). « فرآیند به‌کارگیری نقاب برای اسطوره‌سازی در تحلیل گفتمان لاکلا و موف (در قصیده «خروج رأس الحسین من المدن الخائنة» از قاسم حداد». دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، پژوهشنامة نقد ادب عربی، دورة 10، شمارة20، صص 99-120.
کوچری، رضا. (۱۳۸3ش). «شرح حال و بررسی اشعار قاسم حدّاد». دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکزی: پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد.
مشکوة‌الدینی، مهدی. (1366). دستور زبان فارسی بر پایة نظریة گشتاری. مشهد: دانشگاه فردوسی.
یارمحمدی، لطف‌الله. (1381). «تحلیل گفتمان با استفاده از مؤلفه‌های جامعه‌شناختی- معنایی گفتمان‌مدار با عنایت به تصویرسازی کارگزاران اجتماعی»، دانشگاه شهید باهنر، نشریة دانشکدة ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دورة8، شمارة10، 105-119.
Van Dijk, T. A. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis”. Journal of Political Ideologies. 11(2). Pp: 115-140. 2006.
Van Dijk, T.A. “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press”. in Approaches to Media Discourse. (ed.) by Bell, A. and Peter Garrett, Oxford: Blackwell, 21-63. 1998.
Van Dijk, T.A. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis: in Critical Discoursc Analysis, (ed.) M. Toolan, London: Routledge. 2002.
Walker, V. “Codeswitching as a power and solidarity strategy in the foreign language classroom: an analysis of language alternation strategies utilized in a Portuguese-English higher education class”. Innervate. Vol 3. PP. 362.363. 2011.
 
Journal Of Sacred Defense Literature
Volume 5, Issue 8 - Serial Number 8
March 2021
Pages 131-144

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics